One V162 blade on its carrier and steering bogey: a single indivisible load about 85 metres long, moved in one piece from port to site.
When a developer asks whether they can build a 100 MW wind farm on a given site, the answer almost never comes from grid capacity, wind-speed maps, or even land tenure. It comes from a question most feasibility studies skip past:
Can the blade get there?
A Vestas V150 turbine ships with three 73.7-metre blades; the larger V162 ships with 79.4-metre blades. Add the carrier frame and the steering bogey, and you are moving a single indivisible load around 85 metres long, about three and a half tennis courts laid end to end, through towns, around roundabouts, under footbridges, over rural drift crossings, and across weight-restricted causeways.
Three constraints, in order
On every Kenyan swept-path study I have run since 2019 (Kipeto, Chania Green, Aperture, and the 300 MW multi-county green-hydrogen study for Fortescue Future Industries), the same three constraints decide the corridor, in this order.
Horizontal swept path
≈ 24 m envelope vs 9–15 m road
Vertical clearance
≈ 5.0 m load vs 4.4–5.3 m
Pavement & structures
90–115 t abnormal load
Every blade movement has to clear the same three gates: the swept path through the turn, the height under the structures, and the load on whatever it crosses.
Horizontal swept path. A 79-metre blade swung around a roundabout needs a clear envelope that is frequently wider than the road reserve. Most Kenyan B-roads give a 9-to-15-metre formation; the swept envelope of a V162 blade through a 30-metre-radius turn is closer to 24 metres, and everything inside it has to go: street furniture, walls, kiosks, mature trees, and overhead utility lines.
Vertical clearance. Bridge clearance on classified Kenyan roads is nominally around 5.1 metres, but the as-built reality on the Northern Corridor runs between 4.4 and 5.3 metres. A loaded blade carrier sits at about 5.0 metres, so the margins are thin. The tightest pinch points are almost always footbridges added after the original road geometry was set.
Pavement and structure loading. A complete blade-carrier rig grosses 90 to 115 tonnes. Many rural drift crossings and minor structures were designed for normal highway traffic (HA loading), not for an abnormal load of that weight; a single blade movement needs temporary load-spreading mats or, on three of these projects, a temporary culvert bypass.
The corridor that clears all three becomes the project's real site-selection criterion, ahead of the wind-resource map.
What this means for siting
If the site sits beyond a horizon of road geometry that cannot physically take the blade, CAPEX climbs 15 to 30 percent before the first turbine is erected. From completed studies: a single 12-kilometre bypass realignment on a coastal corridor added hundreds of millions of shillings to baseline logistics, and a swing-bridge weight-limit upgrade in the Rift Valley added the better part of a year to the critical path.
The more useful lesson is the inverse. When you find a corridor that already moves 80-metre blades, with the clearances, swept paths, and load capacity intact from port to site, the land behind that corridor becomes disproportionately valuable for renewable energy. Mombasa Port to Kajiado County, the Kipeto corridor, is the Kenyan example, and there are not many.
The crux
For a utility-scale wind project, the binding constraint is rarely the wind. It is the worst metre of road between the port and the site, and that metre is usually fixed long before the developer arrives.
A field note, continued
I will keep posting these as I work through current projects. If you are scoping a wind site and want a swept-path feasibility view before you commit to the EPC contract, that is a conversation worth having early, while the corridor can still shape the site rather than the other way round.
Scoping a wind site?
A swept-path read before the EPC contract is signed can save months of programme and a real share of the logistics budget. Happy to talk it through.